'Weak Dependency Graph [60.0]' ------------------------------ Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost runtime-complexity with respect to Rules: { sum(0()) -> 0() , sum(s(x)) -> +(sum(x), s(x)) , sum1(0()) -> 0() , sum1(s(x)) -> s(+(sum1(x), +(x, x)))} Details: We have computed the following set of weak (innermost) dependency pairs: { sum^#(0()) -> c_0() , sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x)) , sum1^#(0()) -> c_2() , sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} The usable rules are: {} The estimated dependency graph contains the following edges: {sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x))} ==> {sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x))} {sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x))} ==> {sum^#(0()) -> c_0()} {sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} ==> {sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} {sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} ==> {sum1^#(0()) -> c_2()} We consider the following path(s): 1) {sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x))} The usable rules for this path are empty. We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation: Interpretation Functions: sum(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] 0() = [0] s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] +(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] sum1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum1^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] c_3(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem: 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x))} Weak Rules: {} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x))} and weakly orienting the rules {} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x))} Details: Interpretation Functions: sum(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] 0() = [0] s(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] +(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] sum1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [3] sum1^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] c_3(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'Empty TRS' ----------- Answer: YES(?,O(1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {} Weak Rules: {sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x))} Details: The given problem does not contain any strict rules 2) { sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x)) , sum^#(0()) -> c_0()} The usable rules for this path are empty. We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation: Interpretation Functions: sum(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] 0() = [0] s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] +(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] sum1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum1^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] c_3(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem: 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {sum^#(0()) -> c_0()} Weak Rules: {sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x))} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {sum^#(0()) -> c_0()} and weakly orienting the rules {sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {sum^#(0()) -> c_0()} Details: Interpretation Functions: sum(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] 0() = [0] s(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] +(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] sum1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] sum1^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] c_3(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'Empty TRS' ----------- Answer: YES(?,O(1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {} Weak Rules: { sum^#(0()) -> c_0() , sum^#(s(x)) -> c_1(sum^#(x))} Details: The given problem does not contain any strict rules 3) { sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x)) , sum1^#(0()) -> c_2()} The usable rules for this path are empty. We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation: Interpretation Functions: sum(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] 0() = [0] s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] +(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] sum1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum1^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] c_3(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem: 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {sum1^#(0()) -> c_2()} Weak Rules: {sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {sum1^#(0()) -> c_2()} and weakly orienting the rules {sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {sum1^#(0()) -> c_2()} Details: Interpretation Functions: sum(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] 0() = [0] s(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] +(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] sum1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum1^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_2() = [0] c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [0] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'Empty TRS' ----------- Answer: YES(?,O(1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {} Weak Rules: { sum1^#(0()) -> c_2() , sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} Details: The given problem does not contain any strict rules 4) {sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} The usable rules for this path are empty. We have oriented the usable rules with the following strongly linear interpretation: Interpretation Functions: sum(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] 0() = [0] s(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] +(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] sum1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum1^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_2() = [0] c_3(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] We have applied the subprocessor on the resulting DP-problem: 'Weight Gap Principle' ---------------------- Answer: YES(?,O(n^1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} Weak Rules: {} Details: We apply the weight gap principle, strictly orienting the rules {sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} and weakly orienting the rules {} using the following strongly linear interpretation: Processor 'Matrix Interpretation' oriented the following rules strictly: {sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} Details: Interpretation Functions: sum(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] 0() = [0] s(x1) = [1] x1 + [8] +(x1, x2) = [0] x1 + [0] x2 + [0] sum1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum^#(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] c_0() = [0] c_1(x1) = [0] x1 + [0] sum1^#(x1) = [1] x1 + [1] c_2() = [0] c_3(x1) = [1] x1 + [3] Finally we apply the subprocessor 'Empty TRS' ----------- Answer: YES(?,O(1)) Input Problem: innermost DP runtime-complexity with respect to Strict Rules: {} Weak Rules: {sum1^#(s(x)) -> c_3(sum1^#(x))} Details: The given problem does not contain any strict rules